For other uses, see Fraction (disambiguation).
A common fraction is a numeral which represents a rational number.
That same number can also be represented as a decimal, a percent, or with a negative exponent.
For example, 0.01, 1%, and 10 are all equal to the fraction 1/100.
An integer can be thought of as having an implicit denominator of one (for example, 7 equals 7/1).
Thus the fraction 3/4 can also be used to represent the ratio 3:4 (the ratio of the part to the whole), and the division 3 ÷ 4 (three divided by four).
The non-zero denominator rule, which applies when representing a division as a fraction, is an example of the rule that division by zero is undefined.
We can also write negative fractions, which represent the opposite of a positive fraction.
For example, if 1/2 represents a half dollar profit, then −1/2 represents a half dollar loss.
Because of the rules of division of signed numbers (which states in part that negative divided by positive is negative), −1/2, –1/2 and 1/–2 all represent the same fraction—negative one-half.
And because a negative divided by a negative produces a positive, –1/–2 represents positive one-half.
In mathematics the set of all numbers that can be expressed in the form a/b, where a and b are integers and b is not zero, is called the set of rational numbers and is represented by the symbol Q, which stands for quotient.
A number is a rational number precisely when it can be written in that form (i.e., as a common fraction).
However, the word fraction can also be used to describe mathematical expressions that are not rational numbers.
Examples of these usages include algebraic fractions (quotients of algebraic expressions), and expressions that contain irrational numbers, such as √2/2 (see square root of 2) and π/4 (see proof that π is irrational).
In a fraction, the number of equal parts being described is the numerator (from Latin numerātor, "counter" or "numberer"), and the type or variety of the parts is the denominator (from Latin dēnōminātor, "thing that names or designates").
As an example, the fraction ⁄5 amounts to eight parts, each of which is of the type named "fifth".
Informally, the numerator and denominator may be distinguished by placement alone, but in formal contexts they are usually separated by a fraction bar.
The fraction bar may be horizontal (as in 1/3), oblique (as in 2/5), or diagonal (as in ⁄9).
In typography, fractions stacked vertically are also known as "en" or "nut fractions", and diagonal ones as "em" or "mutton fractions", based on whether a fraction with a single-digit numerator and denominator occupies the proportion of a narrow en square, or a wider em square.
In traditional typefounding, a piece of type bearing a complete fraction (e.g. 1/2) was known as a "case fraction," while those representing only part of fraction were called "piece fractions."
The denominators of English fractions are generally expressed as ordinal numbers, in the plural if the numerator is not one.
(For example, ⁄5 and ⁄5 are both read as a number of "fifths".)
Exceptions include the denominator 2, which is always read "half" or "halves", the denominator 4, which may be alternatively expressed as "quarter"/"quarters" or as "fourth"/"fourths", and the denominator 100, which may be alternatively expressed as "hundredth"/"hundredths" or "percent".
When the denominator is 1, it may be expressed in terms of "wholes" but is more commonly ignored, with the numerator read out as a whole number.
For example, 3/1 may be described as "three wholes", or simply as "three".
When the numerator is one, it may be omitted (as in "a tenth" or "each quarter").
The entire fraction may be expressed as a single composition, in which case it is hyphenated, or as a number of fractions with a numerator of one, in which case they are not.
(For example, "two-fifths" is the fraction 2/5 and "two fifths" is the same fraction understood as 2 instances of ⁄5.)
Fractions should always be hyphenated when used as adjectives.
Alternatively, a fraction may be described by reading it out as the numerator "over" the denominator, with the denominator expressed as a cardinal number.
(For example, 3/1 may also be expressed as "three over one".)
The term "over" is used even in the case of solidus fractions, where the numbers are placed left and right of a slash mark.
(For example, 1/2 may be read "one-half", "one half", or "one over two".)
Fractions with large denominators that are not powers of ten are often rendered in this fashion (e.g., 1/117 as "one over one hundred seventeen"), while those with denominators divisible by ten are typically read in the normal ordinal fashion (e.g., 6/1000000 as "six-millionths", "six millionths", or "six one-millionths").
Forms of fractions
Simple, common, or vulgar fractions
Common fractions can be positive or negative, and they can be proper or improper (see below).
Compound fractions, complex fractions, mixed numerals, and decimals (see below) are not common fractions; though, unless irrational, they can be evaluated to a common fraction.
Proper and improper fractions
Common fractions can be classified as either proper or improper.
When the numerator and the denominator are both positive, the fraction is called proper if the numerator is less than the denominator, and improper otherwise.
The concept of an "improper fraction" is a late development, with the terminology deriving from the fact that "fraction" means "a piece", so a proper fraction must be less than 1.
This was explained in the 17th century textbook The Ground of Arts.
In general, a common fraction is said to be a proper fraction, if the absolute value of the fraction is strictly less than one—that is, if the fraction is greater than −1 and less than 1.
It is said to be an improper fraction, or sometimes top-heavy fraction, if the absolute value of the fraction is greater than or equal to 1.
Examples of proper fractions are 2/3, –3/4, and 4/9, whereas examples of improper fractions are 9/4, –4/3, and 3/3.
Reciprocals and the "invisible denominator"
A ratio is a relationship between two or more numbers that can be sometimes expressed as a fraction.
Typically, a number of items are grouped and compared in a ratio, specifying numerically the relationship between each group.
Ratios are expressed as "group 1 to group 2 ... to group n".
For example, if a car lot had 12 vehicles, of which
- 2 are white,
- 6 are red, and
- 4 are yellow,
then the ratio of red to white to yellow cars is 6 to 2 to 4.
The ratio of yellow cars to white cars is 4 to 2 and may be expressed as 4:2 or 2:1.
A ratio is often converted to a fraction when it is expressed as a ratio to the whole.
In the above example, the ratio of yellow cars to all the cars on the lot is 4:12 or 1:3.
We can convert these ratios to a fraction, and say that ⁄12 of the cars or ⁄3 of the cars in the lot are yellow.
Therefore, if a person randomly chose one car on the lot, then there is a one in three chance or probability that it would be yellow.
Decimal fractions and percentages
Decimal fractions can also be expressed using scientific notation with negative exponents, such as 6.023×10, which represents 0.0000006023.
The 10 represents a denominator of 10.
Dividing by 10 moves the decimal point 7 places to the left.
Decimal fractions with infinitely many digits to the right of the decimal separator represent an infinite series.
For example, 1/3 = 0.333... represents the infinite series 3/10 + 3/100 + 3/1000 + ... .
Another kind of fraction is the percentage (Latin per centum meaning "per hundred", represented by the symbol %), in which the implied denominator is always 100.
Thus, 51% means 51/100.
Percentages greater than 100 or less than zero are treated in the same way, e.g. 311% equals 311/100, and −27% equals −27/100.
The related concept of permille or parts per thousand (ppt) has an implied denominator of 1000, while the more general parts-per notation, as in 75 parts per million (ppm), means that the proportion is 75/1,000,000.
Whether common fractions or decimal fractions are used is often a matter of taste and context.
Common fractions are used most often when the denominator is relatively small.
And it is more accurate to multiply 15 by 1/3, for example, than it is to multiply 15 by any decimal approximation of one third.
Monetary values are commonly expressed as decimal fractions with denominator 100, i.e., with two decimals, for example $3.75.
However, as noted above, in pre-decimal British currency, shillings and pence were often given the form (but not the meaning) of a fraction, as, for example 3/6 (read "three and six") meaning 3 shillings and 6 pence, and having no relationship to the fraction 3/6.
An improper fraction can be converted to a mixed number as follows:
Complex and compound fractions
Not to be confused with Complex numbers.
If, in a complex fraction, there is no unique way to tell which fraction lines takes precedence, then this expression is improperly formed, because of ambiguity.
So 5/10/20/40 is not a valid mathematical expression, because of multiple possible interpretations, e.g. as
Nevertheless, "complex fraction" and "compound fraction" may both by considered outdated and now used in no well-defined manner, partly even taken synonymously for each other or for mixed numerals.
They have lost their meaning as technical terms and the attributes "complex" and "compound" tend to be used in their every day meaning of "consisting of parts".
Arithmetic with fractions
Simplifying (reducing) fractions
The Euclidean algorithm gives a method for finding the greatest common divisor of any two positive integers.
Comparing fractions with the same positive denominator yields the same result as comparing the numerators:
If the equal denominators are negative, then the opposite result of comparing the numerators holds for the fractions:
If two positive fractions have the same numerator, then the fraction with the smaller denominator is the larger number.
When a whole is divided into equal pieces, if fewer equal pieces are needed to make up the whole, then each piece must be larger.
When two positive fractions have the same numerator, they represent the same number of parts, but in the fraction with the smaller denominator, the parts are larger.
Because every negative number, including negative fractions, is less than zero, and every positive number, including positive fractions, is greater than zero, it follows that any negative fraction is less than any positive fraction.
This allows, together with the above rules, to compare all possible fractions.
The first rule of addition is that only like quantities can be added; for example, various quantities of quarters.
Unlike quantities, such as adding thirds to quarters, must first be converted to like quantities as described below: Imagine a pocket containing two quarters, and another pocket containing three quarters; in total, there are five quarters.
Since four quarters is equivalent to one (dollar), this can be represented as follows:
Adding unlike quantities
For adding quarters to thirds, both types of fraction are converted to twelfths, thus:
Consider adding the following two quantities:
Now it can be seen that:
is equivalent to:
This method can be expressed algebraically:
The smallest possible denominator is given by the least common multiple of the single denominators, which results from dividing the rote multiple by all common factors of the single denominators.
This is called the least common denominator.
The process for subtracting fractions is, in essence, the same as that of adding them: find a common denominator, and change each fraction to an equivalent fraction with the chosen common denominator.
The resulting fraction will have that denominator, and its numerator will be the result of subtracting the numerators of the original fractions.
Multiplying a fraction by another fraction
To multiply fractions, multiply the numerators and multiply the denominators.
To explain the process, consider one third of one quarter.
Using the example of a cake, if three small slices of equal size make up a quarter, and four quarters make up a whole, twelve of these small, equal slices make up a whole.
Therefore, a third of a quarter is a twelfth.
Now consider the numerators.
The first fraction, two thirds, is twice as large as one third.
Since one third of a quarter is one twelfth, two thirds of a quarter is two twelfth.
The second fraction, three quarters, is three times as large as one quarter, so two thirds of three quarters is three times as large as two thirds of one quarter.
Thus two thirds times three quarters is six twelfths.
A short cut for multiplying fractions is called "cancellation".
Effectively the answer is reduced to lowest terms during multiplication.
A two is a common factor in both the numerator of the left fraction and the denominator of the right and is divided out of both.
Three is a common factor of the left denominator and right numerator and is divided out of both.
Multiplying a fraction by a whole number
Since a whole number can be rewritten as itself divided by 1, normal fraction multiplication rules can still apply.
This method works because the fraction 6/1 means six equal parts, each one of which is a whole.
Multiplying mixed numbers
When multiplying mixed numbers, it is considered preferable to convert the mixed number into an improper fraction.
Converting between decimals and fractions
Converting repeating decimals to fractions
See also: Repeating decimal
Decimal numbers, while arguably more useful to work with when performing calculations, sometimes lack the precision that common fractions have.
Sometimes an infinite repeating decimal is required to reach the same precision.
Thus, it is often useful to convert repeating decimals into fractions.
The preferred way to indicate a repeating decimal is to place a bar (known as a vinculum) over the digits that repeat, for example 0.789 = 0.789789789... For repeating patterns where the repeating pattern begins immediately after the decimal point, a simple division of the pattern by the same number of nines as numbers it has will suffice.
- 0.5 = 5/9
- 0.62 = 62/99
- 0.264 = 264/999
- 0.6291 = 6291/9999
- 0.05 = 5/90
- 0.000392 = 392/999000
- 0.0012 = 12/9900
In case a non-repeating set of decimals precede the pattern (such as 0.1523987), we can write it as the sum of the non-repeating and repeating parts, respectively:
- 0.1523 + 0.0000987
Then, convert both parts to fractions, and add them using the methods described above:
- 1523 / 10000 + 987 / 9990000 = 1522464 / 9990000
Alternatively, algebra can be used, such as below:
- Let x = the repeating decimal:
- x = 0.1523987
- 10,000x = 1,523.987
- 10,000,000x = 1,523,987.987
- 10,000,000x − 10,000x = 1,523,987.987 − 1,523.987
- 9,990,000x = 1,523,987 − 1,523
- 9,990,000x = 1,522,464
- x = 1522464 / 9990000
Fractions in abstract mathematics
These definitions agree in every case with the definitions given above; only the notation is different.
Alternatively, instead of defining subtraction and division as operations, the "inverse" fractions with respect to addition and multiplication might be defined as:
Furthermore, the relation, specified as
is an equivalence relation of fractions.
Each fraction from one equivalence class may be considered as a representative for the whole class, and each whole class may be considered as one abstract fraction.
This equivalence is preserved by the above defined operations, i.e., the results of operating on fractions are independent of the selection of representatives from their equivalence class.
Formally, for addition of fractions
and similarly for the other operations.
In the case of fractions of integers, the fractions a/b with a and b coprime and b > 0 are often taken as uniquely determined representatives for their equivalent fractions, which are considered to be the same rational number.
This way the fractions of integers make up the field of the rational numbers.
More generally, a and b may be elements of any integral domain R, in which case a fraction is an element of the field of fractions of R. For example, polynomials in one indeterminate, with coefficients from some integral domain D, are themselves an integral domain, call it P. So for a and b elements of P, the generated field of fractions is the field of rational fractions (also known as the field of rational functions).
Main article: Algebraic fraction
A fraction may also contain radicals in the numerator and/or the denominator.
If the denominator contains radicals, it can be helpful to rationalize it (compare Simplified form of a radical expression), especially if further operations, such as adding or comparing that fraction to another, are to be carried out.
It is also more convenient if division is to be done manually.
When the denominator is a monomial square root, it can be rationalized by multiplying both the top and the bottom of the fraction by the denominator:
The process of rationalization of binomial denominators involves multiplying the top and the bottom of a fraction by the conjugate of the denominator so that the denominator becomes a rational number.
Even if this process results in the numerator being irrational, like in the examples above, the process may still facilitate subsequent manipulations by reducing the number of irrationals one has to work with in the denominator.
See also: Slash § Encoding
Scientific publishing distinguishes four ways to set fractions, together with guidelines on use:
About 4000 years ago, Egyptians divided with fractions using slightly different methods.
They used least common multiples with unit fractions.
Their methods gave the same answer as modern methods.
Their works form fractions by placing the numerators (Sanskrit: amsa) over the denominators (cheda), but without a bar between them.
In Sanskrit literature, fractions were always expressed as an addition to or subtraction from an integer.
The integer was written on one line and the fraction in its two parts on the next line.
If the fraction was marked by a small circle ⟨०⟩ or cross ⟨+⟩, it is subtracted from the integer; if no such sign appears, it is understood to be added.
For example, Bhaskara I writes:
- ६ १ २
- १ १ १०
- ४ ५ ९
which is the equivalent of
- 6 1 2
- 1 1 −1
- 4 5 9
and would be written in modern notation as 61/4, 11/5, and 2 − 1/9 (i.e., 18/9).
While the Persian mathematician Jamshīd al-Kāshī claimed to have discovered decimal fractions himself in the 15th century, J. Lennart Berggren notes that he was mistaken, as decimal fractions were first used five centuries before him by the Baghdadi mathematician Abu'l-Hasan al-Uqlidisi as early as the 10th century.
In formal education
In primary schools, fractions have been demonstrated through Cuisenaire rods, Fraction Bars, fraction strips, fraction circles, paper (for folding or cutting), pattern blocks, pie-shaped pieces, plastic rectangles, grid paper, dot paper, geoboards, counters and computer software.
Documents for teachers
Credits to the contents of this page go to the authors of the corresponding Wikipedia page: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fraction.