"Endemic" redirects here.
For the epidemiological context, see Endemic (epidemiology).
Endemism is the state of a species being native to a single defined geographic location, such as an island, state, nation, country or other defined zone; organisms that are indigenous to a place are not endemic to it if they are also found elsewhere.
The extreme opposite of an endemic species is one with a cosmopolitan distribution, having a global or widespread range.
A rare alternative term for a species that is endemic is 'precinctive', which applies to species (and other taxonomic levels) that are restricted to a defined geographical area.
Endēmos is formed of en meaning "in", and dēmos meaning "the people".
The word entered the English language as a loan word from French endémique, and originally seems to have been used in the sense of diseases which occur at a constant amount in a country, as opposed to epidemic diseases, which are exploding in cases.
The word was used in biology in 1872 to mean a species restricted to a specific location by Charles Darwin.
The more uncommon term 'precinctive' has been used by a some entomologists as the equivalent of 'endemism'.
The word was first used in botany by Vaughan MacCaughey in Hawaii in 1917.
Juan J. Morrone states that a species may be endemic to any particular geographic region, regardless of size, thus the cougar is endemic to the Americas, however, endemism is normally used only where there is a considerable restriction in the area of distribution.
All species are not endemics, some species may be cosmopolitan.
All endemics are not necessarily rare -some might be common where they occur.
All rare species are not necessarily endemics, some may have a large range but be rare throughout this range.
Endemism is caused by historical and ecological factors.
Vicariant events caused by drifting continents, dispersal and extinction are some possible historical factors.
Ecological factors can explain the present limits on a distribution.
Endemic species are especially likely to develop on geographically and biologically isolated areas such as islands and remote island groups, including Hawaii, the Galápagos Islands and Socotra, because of the potential for isolation and therefore evolution through allopatric speciation.
Darwin's finches in the Galápagos archipelago are examples of species endemic to islands.
The stability of a region's climate and habitat through time may also contribute to high rates of endemism (especially paleoendemism), acting as refuges for species during times of climate change like Ice Ages.
These changes may have caused species to repeatedly restrict their ranges into these refuges, leading to regions with many small-ranged species.
In many cases biological factors, such as low rates of dispersal or returning to the spawning area (philopatry), can cause a particular group of organisms to have high speciation rates and thus many endemic species.
Plants which become endemic on isolated islands are often those which have a high rate of dispersal, and are able to reach such islands by being dispersed by birds.
Microorganisms were traditionally not believed to form endemics.
The hypothesis 'everything is everywhere', first stated in Dutch by Lourens G.M.
Baas Becking in 1934, describes the theory that the distribution of organisms smaller than 2mm is cosmopolitan where habitats occur that support their growth.
Endemic taxa can also be classified into autochtonous, allochtonous, taxonomic relicts and biogeographic relicts.
Paleoendemism refers to species that were formerly widespread but are now restricted to a smaller area.
Neoendemism refers to species that have recently arisen, such as through divergence and reproductive isolation or through hybridization and polyploidy in plants, and have not dispersed beyond a limited range.
Similarly, a 'relictual taxon' is a taxon (e.g. species or other lineage) that is the sole surviving representative of a formerly diverse group.
Schizoendemics, apoendemics and patroendemics can all be classified as types of neoendemics.
Schizoendemics arise from a wider distributed taxon which has become reproductively isolated without becoming (potentially) genetically isolated - a schizoendemic has the same chromosome count as the parent taxon it evolved from.
An apoendemic is a polyploid of the parent taxon (or taxa in the case of allopolyploids), whereas a patroendemic has a lower, diploid chromosome count than the related, more widely distributed polyploid taxon.
Pseudoendemics are taxa which have possibly recently evolved from a mutation.
Holoendemics is a concept introduced by Richardson 1978 to describe taxa which have remained endemic to a restricted distribution for a very long time.
In a 2000 paper, Myers and de Grave further attempted to redefine the concept.
In their view, everything is endemic, even cosmopolitan species are endemic to earth, and earlier definitions restricting endemics to specific locations are wrong.
Thus the subdivisions neoendemics and paleoendemics are without merit regarding the study of distributions, because these concepts consider that an endemic has a distribution limited to one place.
Instead, they propose four different categories: holoendemics, euryendemics, stenoendemics and rhoendemics.
In their scheme cryptoendemics and euendemics are further subdivisions of rhoendemics.
In their view, a holoendemic is a cosmopolitan species.
Stenoendemics, also known as local endemics, have a reduced distribution and are synonymous with the word 'endemics' in the traditional sense, whereas euryendemics have a larger distribution -both these have distributions which are more or less continuous.
A rhoendemic has a disjunct distribution.
Where this disjunct distribution is caused by vicariance, in an euendemic the vicariance was geologic in nature, such as the movement of tectonic plates, but in a cryptoendemic the disjunct distribution was due to extinction of the intervening populations.
There is yet another possible situation which can cause a disjunct distribution, where a species is able to colonise new territories by crossing over areas of unsuitable habitat, such as plants colonising an island -this situation they dismiss as extremely rare and do not devise a name for.
Traditionally, none of Myers and de Grave's categories would be considered endemics except stenoendemics.
These soils are found in the Balkan Peninsula, Turkey, Alps, Cuba, New Caledonia, the North American Appalachians, and a scattered distribution in California, Oregon, and Washington and elsewhere For example, Mayer and Soltis considered the widespread subspecies Steptanthus glandulosus subsp. which grows on normal soils, to be a paleoendemic, whereas closely related endemic forms of S. glandulosus occurring on serpentine soil patches are neoendemics which recently evolved from subsp. glandulosus
Isolated islands commonly develop a number of endemics.
Mountains can be seen as 'sky islands': refugia of endemics because species that live in the cool climates of mountain peaks are geographically isolated.
For example, in the Alpes-Maritimes department of France, Saxifraga florulenta, is an endemic plant that may have evolved in the Late Miocene and could have once been widespread across the Mediterranean Basin.
Some scientists claim that the presence of endemic species in an area is a good method to find geographical regions which can be considered priorities for conservation.
Endemism can thus be studied as a proxy for measuring biodiversity of a region.
The concept of finding endemic species which occur in the same region to designate 'endemism hotspots' was first proposed by Paul Müller in a 1973 book.
According to him, this is only possible where 1.)
the taxonomy of the species in question is not in dispute; 2.)
the species distribution is accurately known; and 3.)
the species have relatively small distributional ranges.
In a 2000 article, Myers et al.
used the standard of having more than 0.5% of the world's plant species being endemics of a the region to designate 25 geographical areas of the world as 'biodiversity hotspots'.
In response to the above, the World Wildlife fund has split the world into a few hundred geographical 'ecoregions'.
These have been designed to include as many species as possible which only occur in a single ecoregion, and these species are thus 'endemics' to these ecoregions.
Other scientists have argued that endemism is not an appropriate measure of biodiversity, because the levels of threat or biodiversity are not actually correlated to areas of high endemism.
When using bird species as an example, it was found that only 2.5% of biodiversity hotspots correlate with endemism and the threatened nature of a geographic region.
A similar pattern had been found before regarding mammals, Lasioglossum bees, Plusiinae moths, and swallowtail butterflies in North America: these different groups of taxa did not correlate geographically with each other regarding endemism and species richness.
Especially using mammals as flagship species proved to be a poor system of identifying and protecting areas of high invertebrate biodiversity.
In response to this, other scientists again defended the concept by using WWF ecoregions and reptiles, finding that most reptile endemics occur in WWF ecoregions with high biodiversity.
Credits to the contents of this page go to the authors of the corresponding Wikipedia page: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Endemism.