Times New Roman

From Wikipedia for FEVERv2
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Times New Roman_table_infobox_0

Times New RomanTimes New Roman_table_caption_0
CategoryTimes New Roman_header_cell_0_0_0 SerifTimes New Roman_cell_0_0_1
ClassificationTimes New Roman_header_cell_0_1_0 Mixed

Transitional Old-styleTimes New Roman_cell_0_1_1

Designer(s)Times New Roman_header_cell_0_2_0 Stanley Morison

Victor LardentTimes New Roman_cell_0_2_1

Commissioned byTimes New Roman_header_cell_0_3_0 The TimesTimes New Roman_cell_0_3_1
FoundryTimes New Roman_header_cell_0_4_0 MonotypeTimes New Roman_cell_0_4_1
Date releasedTimes New Roman_header_cell_0_5_0 1932Times New Roman_cell_0_5_1
LicenseTimes New Roman_header_cell_0_6_0 ProprietaryTimes New Roman_cell_0_6_1
Design based onTimes New Roman_header_cell_0_7_0 PlantinTimes New Roman_cell_0_7_1

Times New Roman is a serif typeface. Times New Roman_sentence_0

It was commissioned by the British newspaper The Times in 1931 and conceived by Stanley Morison, the artistic adviser to the British branch of the printing equipment company Monotype, in collaboration with Victor Lardent, a lettering artist in The Times's advertising department. Times New Roman_sentence_1

It has become one of the most popular typefaces of all time and is installed on most desktop computers. Times New Roman_sentence_2

Asked to advise on a redesign, Morison recommended that The Times change their text typeface from a spindly nineteenth-century face to a more robust, solid design, returning to traditions of printing from the eighteenth century and before. Times New Roman_sentence_3

This matched a common trend in printing tastes of the period. Times New Roman_sentence_4

Morison proposed an older Monotype typeface named Plantin as a basis for the design, and Times New Roman mostly matches Plantin's dimensions. Times New Roman_sentence_5

The main change was that the contrast between strokes was enhanced to give a crisper image. Times New Roman_sentence_6

The new design made its debut in The Times on 3 October 1932. Times New Roman_sentence_7

After one year, the design was released for commercial sale. Times New Roman_sentence_8

In Times New Roman's name, Roman is a reference to the regular or roman style (sometimes also called Antiqua), the first part of the Times New Roman family to be designed. Times New Roman_sentence_9

Roman type has roots in Italian printing of the late 15th and early 16th centuries, but Times New Roman's design has no connection to Rome or to the Romans. Times New Roman_sentence_10

The Times stayed with Times New Roman for 40 years, but new production techniques and the format change from broadsheet to tabloid in 2004 have caused it to switch typeface five times from 1972 to 2007. Times New Roman_sentence_11

However, all the new fonts have been variants of the original New Roman typeface. Times New Roman_sentence_12

Design Times New Roman_section_0

Times New Roman has a robust colour on the page and influences of European early modern and Baroque printing. Times New Roman_sentence_13

As a typeface designed for newspaper printing, Times New Roman has a high x-height, short descenders to allow tight linespacing and a relatively condensed appearance. Times New Roman_sentence_14

The roman style of Plantin was loosely based on a metal type created in the late sixteenth century by the French artisan Robert Granjon and preserved in the collection of the Plantin-Moretus Museum of Antwerp. Times New Roman_sentence_15

This style is sometimes categorised as part of the "old-style" of serif fonts (from before the eighteenth century). Times New Roman_sentence_16

(The 'a' of Plantin was not based on Granjon's work: the Plantin-Moretus Museum's type had a substitute 'a' cut later.) Times New Roman_sentence_17

Indeed, the working title of Times New Roman was "Times Old Style". Times New Roman_sentence_18

However, Times New Roman modifies the Granjon influence further than Plantin due to features such as its 'a' and 'e', with very large counters and apertures, its ball terminal detailing and an increased level of contrast between thick and thin strokes, so it has often been compared to fonts from the late eighteenth century, the so-called 'transitional' genre, in particular the Baskerville typeface of the 1750s. Times New Roman_sentence_19

Historian and sometime Monotype executive Allan Haley commented that compared to Plantin "serifs had been sharpened...contrast was increased and character curves were refined," while Lawson described Times's higher-contrast crispness as having "a sparkle [Plantin] never achieved". Times New Roman_sentence_20

Other changes from Plantin include a straight-sided 'M' and 'W' with three upper terminals not Plantin's four, both choices that move away from the old-style model. Times New Roman_sentence_21

Italic and bold Times New Roman_section_1

Morison described the companion italic as also being influenced by the typefaces created by the Didot family in the late 18th and early 19th centuries: a "rationalistic italic that owed nothing to the tradition of the sixteenth or seventeenth centuries. Times New Roman_sentence_22

It has, indeed, more in common with the eighteenth century." Times New Roman_sentence_23

Morison had several years earlier attracted attention for promoting the radical idea that italics in book printing were too disruptive to the flow of text, and should be phased out. Times New Roman_sentence_24

He rapidly came to concede that the idea was impractical, and later wryly commented to historian Harry Carter that Times' italic "owes more to Didot than dogma." Times New Roman_sentence_25

Morison wrote in a personal letter of Times New Roman's mixed heritage that it "has the merit of not looking as if it had been designed by somebody in particular." Times New Roman_sentence_26

Rather than creating a companion boldface with letterforms similar to the roman style, Times New Roman's bold has a different character, with a more condensed and more upright effect caused by making the horizontal parts of curves consistently the thinnest lines of each letter, and making the top serifs of letters like 'd' purely horizontal. Times New Roman_sentence_27

This effect is not found in sixteenth-century typefaces (which, in any case, did not have bold versions); it is most associated with the Didone, or "modern" type of the early nineteenth century (and with the more recent 'Ionic' styles of type influenced by it that were offered by Linotype, discussed below). Times New Roman_sentence_28

Some commentators have found Times' bold unsatisfactory and too condensed, such as Walter Tracy. Times New Roman_sentence_29

Historical background Times New Roman_section_2

During the nineteenth century, the standard roman types for general-purpose printing were "Modern" or Didone designs, and these were standard in all newspaper printing. Times New Roman_sentence_30

Designs in the nineteenth-century style remain a common part of the aesthetic of newspaper printing. Times New Roman_sentence_31

According to Mosley and Williamson the modern-face used by The Times was Monotype's Series 7 or "Modern Extended", based on typefaces by Miller and Richard. Times New Roman_sentence_32

By the 1920s, some in the publishing industry felt that the modern-face model was too spindly and high-contrast for optimal legibility at the small sizes and punishing printing techniques of newspaper printing. Times New Roman_sentence_33

In 1925, the Mergenthaler Linotype Company, Monotype's main competitor, launched a new newspaper typeface called Ionic, which became the first in a series known as the Legibility Group. Times New Roman_sentence_34

These kept to the nineteenth-century model but greatly reduced the contrast of the letterform. Times New Roman_sentence_35

The thinnest strokes of the letter were made thicker and strokes were kept as far apart as possible to maximise legibility. Times New Roman_sentence_36

It proved extremely successful: Allen Hutt, Monotype's newspaper printing consultant in the late 1930s, later noted that it "revolutionized newspaper text setting...within eighteen months it was adopted by 3,000 papers." Times New Roman_sentence_37

Although Times New Roman does not in any way resemble it, Walter Tracy, a prominent type designer who worked on a redesign of Times in the 1970s and wrote an analyis of its design in his book Letters of Credit (1986), commented that its arrival must at least have influenced the decision to consider a redesign. Times New Roman_sentence_38

The development of Times New Roman was relatively involved due to the lack of a specific pre-existing model – or perhaps a surfeit of possible choices. Times New Roman_sentence_39

Morison wrote in a memo that he hoped for a design that would have relatively sharp serifs, matching the general design of the Times' previous font, but on a darker and more traditional basic structure. Times New Roman_sentence_40

Bulked-up versions of Monotype's pre-existing but rather dainty Baskerville and Perpetua typefaces were considered for a basis, and the Legibility Group designs were also examined. Times New Roman_sentence_41

(Perpetua, which Monotype had recently commissioned from sculptor Eric Gill at Morison's urging, is considered a 'transitional' design in aesthetic, although it does not revive any specific model.) Times New Roman_sentence_42

Walter Tracy, who knew Lardent, suggested in the 1980s that "Morison did not begin with a clear vision of the ultimate type, but felt his way along." Times New Roman_sentence_43

Morison's biographer Nicolas Barker has written that Morison's memos of the time wavered over a variety of options before it was ultimately concluded that Plantin formed the best basis for a condensed font that could nonetheless be made to fill out the full size of the letter space as far as possible. Times New Roman_sentence_44

(Morison ultimately conceded that Perpetua, which had been his pet project, was 'too basically circular' to be practical to condense in an attractive way.) Times New Roman_sentence_45

Walter Tracy and James Moran, who discussed the design's creation with Lardent in the 1960s, found that Lardent himself had little memory of exactly what material Morison gave him as a specimen to use to design the typeface, but he told Moran that he remembered working on the design from archive photographs of vintage type; he thought this was a book printed by Christophe Plantin, the sixteenth-century printer whose printing office the Plantin-Moretus Museum preserves and is named for. Times New Roman_sentence_46

Moran and Tracy suggested that this actually might have been the same specimen of type from the Plantin-Moretus Museum that Plantin had been based on. Times New Roman_sentence_47

(Although based on a type in the collection of the Museum, the typeface Plantin is actually based specifically on a Granjon font for which matrices (moulds) only arrived in the collection after Plantin's death.) Times New Roman_sentence_48

The sharpened serifs somewhat recall Perpetua, although Morison's stated reason for them was to provide continuity with the previous Didone design and the crispness associated with the Times' printing; he also cited as a reason that sharper serifs looked better after stereotyping or printed on a rotary press. Times New Roman_sentence_49

Although Morison may not have literally drawn the design, his influence on its concept was sufficient that he felt he could call it "my one effort at designing a font" in a letter to Daniel Berkeley Updike, a prominent American printing historian with whom he corresponded frequently. Times New Roman_sentence_50

Morison's several accounts of his reasoning in designing the concept of Times New Roman were somewhat contradictory and historians of printing have suggested that in practice they were mostly composed to rationalise his pre-existing aesthetic preferences: after Morison's death Allen Hutt went so far as to describe his unsigned 1936 article on the topic as "rather odd…it can only be regarded as a piece of Morisonian mystification". Times New Roman_sentence_51

Lardent's original drawings are according to Rhatigan lost, but photographs exist of his drawings. Times New Roman_sentence_52

Rhatigan comments that Lardent's originals show "the spirit of the final type, but not the details." Times New Roman_sentence_53

The design was adapted from Lardent's large drawings by the Monotype drawing office team in Salfords, Surrey, which worked out spacing and simplified some fine details. Times New Roman_sentence_54

Further changes were made after manufacturing began (the latter a difficult practice, since new punches and matrices had to be machined after each design change). Times New Roman_sentence_55

Morison continued to develop a close connection with the Times that would last throughout his life. Times New Roman_sentence_56

Morison edited the History of the Times from 1935 to 1952, and in the post-war period, at a time when Monotype effectively stopped developing new typefaces due to pressures of austerity, took a post as editor of the Times Literary Supplement which he held from 1945 to 1948. Times New Roman_sentence_57

Times New Roman remained Morison's only type design; he designed a type to be issued by the Bauer Type Foundry of Frankfurt but the project was abandoned due to the war. Times New Roman_sentence_58

Morison's friend Brooke Crutchley recorded in his diary being told by Morison that the test type sent to him just before the war was sent to the government to be "analysed in order that we should know whether the Hun is hard up for lead or antimony or tin." Times New Roman_sentence_59

Metal type versions Times New Roman_section_3

A large number of variants of Times were cut during the metal type period, in particular families of titling capitals for headlines. Times New Roman_sentence_60

Walter Tracy in Letters of Credit, Allen Hutt and others have discussed these extensively in their works on the family. Times New Roman_sentence_61

Titling Times New Roman_section_4

Monotype also created some caps-only 'titling' designs to match Times New Roman itself, which was intended for body text. Times New Roman_sentence_62

These are not sold by Monotype in digital format, although Linotype's Times Eighteen in the same style (see below) is. Times New Roman_sentence_63

Times Hever Titling Times New Roman_section_5

An elegant titling caps design, quite different from Times New Roman with a Caslon-style A (with a serif at top left of the letter, suggesting a stroke written with a quill) and old-style C and W; Tracy suggests Monotype's previous Poliphilus design as an influence. Times New Roman_sentence_64

Named after Hever Castle, the home of the Times' owner Lord Astor and designed early on, it was used by the Times for headings in the lighter sections such as society pages, arts and fashion. Times New Roman_sentence_65

It has not been digitised. Times New Roman_sentence_66

Times Wide (1938, series 427) Times New Roman_section_6

A variant intended for book printing, avoiding the slight condensation of the original Times New Roman. Times New Roman_sentence_67

Although it was popular in the metal type period for book printing, it was apparently never digitised. Times New Roman_sentence_68

Monotype also created a version, series 627, with long descenders more appropriate to classic book typography. Times New Roman_sentence_69

Optional text figures were also available. Times New Roman_sentence_70

Series 727 and 827 Times New Roman_section_7

Monotype also produced Series 727, in which the heavier strokes of upper-case letters were made slightly thinner. Times New Roman_sentence_71

This was done to produce a lighter effect in which capital letters do not stand out so much, and was particularly intended for German use, since in the German language capitals are far more common since they appear at the start of each noun. Times New Roman_sentence_72

Series 827 modified some letters (notably the R) to correspond to their appearance in other typefaces popular in French printing. Times New Roman_sentence_73

This production of what are now called stylistic alternates to suit national tastes was common at the time, and many alternates were also offered for Gill Sans for use in Europe. Times New Roman_sentence_74

Claritas Times New Roman_section_8

A modified 4¾ point size of Times Roman was produced by Monotype for use in printing matter requiring a very small size of type. Times New Roman_sentence_75

Listed as Times Newspaper Smalls, available as either Series 333 or 335, it was also referred to by the name Claritas. Times New Roman_sentence_76

Times 4-line Mathematics Series 569 Times New Roman_section_9

This is a variant designed for printing mathematical formulae, using the 4‑line system for mathematics developed by Monotype in 1957. Times New Roman_sentence_77

This modified version of Times Roman was designed for use as part of Monotype's 4-line Mathematics system. Times New Roman_sentence_78

The major changes to the Times Roman typeface itself were a reduction in the slope of italic characters to 12 degrees from 16 degrees, so as to reduce the need for kerning, and a change in the form of italic v and w so that italic v could be more easily distinguished from a Greek nu. Times New Roman_sentence_79

The 4-line system involved casting characters for 10-point Times Roman on 6-point bodies. Times New Roman_sentence_80

The top of the character would overhang the slug, forming a kern which was less fragile than the normal kerns of foundry type, as it was on a slab of cast metal. Times New Roman_sentence_81

This technique had been in previous use on Monotype machines, usually involving double-height matrices, to allow the automatic setting of "advertising figures" (numbers that occupy two or more lines, usually to clearly indicate a price in an advertisement set in small type). Times New Roman_sentence_82

This meant that the same matrix could be used for both superscript and subscript numbers. Times New Roman_sentence_83

More importantly, it allowed a variable or other item to have both a superscript and a subscript at the same time, one above the other, without inordinate difficulty. Times New Roman_sentence_84

Previously, while the Monotype system, due to its flexibility, was widely used for setting mathematical formulas, Monotype's Modern Series 7 was usually used for this purpose. Times New Roman_sentence_85

Because of the popularity of Times Roman at the time, Monotype chose to design a variant of Times Roman suited to mathematical composition, and recut many additional characters needed for mathematics, including special symbols as well as Greek and Fraktur alphabets, to accompany the system instead of designing it around the typeface that was being used, for which characters were already available. Times New Roman_sentence_86

Matrices for some 700 characters were available as part of Times Roman Series 569 when it was released in 1958, with new characters constantly being added for over a decade afterwards (thus, in 1971, 8,000 characters were included, and new ones were being added at a rate of about 5 per week). Times New Roman_sentence_87

Usage Times New Roman_section_10

Times New Roman's popularity rapidly expanded beyond its original niche, becoming popular in book printing and general publishing. Times New Roman_sentence_88

Monotype promoted the typeface in their trade magazine, The Monotype Recorder took advantage of this popularity by cutting a widened version, Series 427, for book publishing, although many books ultimately used the original version. Times New Roman_sentence_89

(Because the cover of the Monotype Recorder compared the new "Times New Roman" with a sample of the previous type labelled as "Times Old Roman", some writers have assumed that the Times' previous typeface was actually called this, which it was not.) Times New Roman_sentence_90

An early user of Times New Roman outside its origin was by Daniel Berkeley Updike, an influential historian of printing with whom Morison carried an extensive correspondence. Times New Roman_sentence_91

Impressed by the design, he used it to set his book Some Aspects of Printing, Old and New. Times New Roman_sentence_92

It then was chosen by the Crowell-Collier magazines Woman's Home Companion and then its sister publications such as Collier's. Times New Roman_sentence_93

A brochure was published to mark the change along with a letter from Morison hoping that the redesign would be a success. Times New Roman_sentence_94

Ultimately it became Monotype's best-selling metal type of all time. Times New Roman_sentence_95

Walter Tracy, who worked on a redesign, however noted that the design's compression and fine detail extending to the edge of the matrices was not ideal in the aggressive conditions of most newspaper printing, in which the Times was unusual for its particularly high standard of printing suiting its luxury market. Times New Roman_sentence_96

Users found that in the hot metal period it was common for the molten metal to rapidly eat through the matrices as type was being cast, and so it did not become popular among other newspapers: "Times Roman achieved its popularity chiefly in general printing, not in newspaper work." Times New Roman_sentence_97

He described it as particularly used in "book work, especially non-fiction" such as the Encyclopaedia Britannica. Times New Roman_sentence_98

Hutt also commented that Times New Roman's relative condensation was less useful than might be expected for newspaper printing, since in a normal newspaper column frequent paragraph breaks tend to provide area that can absorb the space of wider letters without increasing the number of lines used–but The Times, whose house style in the 1930s was to minimise the number of paragraph breaks, was an exception to this. Times New Roman_sentence_99

A number of early reviews of Times New Roman were published in Morison's lifetime that discussed aspects of its design. Times New Roman_sentence_100

Most were appreciative (Morison was an influential figure in publishing) but several noted that it did not follow conventional expectations of newspaper typeface design. Times New Roman_sentence_101

One article that discussed its design was Optical Scale in Typefounding, written by Harry Carter and published in 1937, which discussed the differences between small and large-size typeface designs. Times New Roman_sentence_102

He commented "The small sizes of Plantin embody what are supposed to be the requirements of a good small type [but] Times Roman, which most people find the easiest to read of small text-types, runs counter to some of them...[Morison] avoided blunt serifs and thickened hairlines because he found they wore down more noticeably than sharper-cut features." Times New Roman_sentence_103

Times New Roman remains popular in publishing, helped by the extremely large range of characters available for international and mathematics printing. Times New Roman_sentence_104

For example, the American Psychological Association suggests using Times New Roman in papers written in its APA style. Times New Roman_sentence_105

Linotype releases Times New Roman_section_11

Despite Monotype's key role in creating Times New Roman, its rival Linotype rapidly began to offer the design; The Times used Linotype equipment for much of its production. Times New Roman_sentence_106

Linotype referred to the design as Times or Times Roman. Times New Roman_sentence_107

Monotype and Linotype have since merged, but slight differences have split the lineage of Times into two subtly different designs. Times New Roman_sentence_108

Although Times New Roman and Times are very similar, various differences developed between the versions marketed by Linotype and Monotype when the master fonts were transferred from metal to photo and digital media. Times New Roman_sentence_109

For example, Linotype has slanted serifs on the capital S, while Monotype's are vertical, and Linotype has an extra serif on the number 5. Times New Roman_sentence_110

Most of these differences are invisible in body text at normal reading distances, or 10pts at 300 dpi. Times New Roman_sentence_111

Subtle competition grew between the two foundries, as the proportions and details as well as the width metrics for their version of Times grew apart. Times New Roman_sentence_112

Differences between the two versions do occur in the lowercase z in the italic weight (Times Linotype has a curl also followed in the STIX revival, Times New Roman is straight), and in the percent sign in all weights (Linotype and STIX have a stroke connecting up the left-hand zero with a slash, Times New Roman does not). Times New Roman_sentence_113

Monotype's 'J' is non-descending, but Linotype's in the bold weight descends below the baseline. Times New Roman_sentence_114

Linotype's metal version of Times had a shrunken 'f' due to a technical limitation of the Linotype system—it could not cast a kerning 'f', one that extended into the space of surrounding letters. Times New Roman_sentence_115

This restriction was removed in the digital version. Times New Roman_sentence_116

Linotype licensed its version to Xerox and then Adobe and Apple, guaranteeing its importance in digital printing by making it one of the core fonts of the PostScript page description language. Times New Roman_sentence_117

Microsoft's version of Times New Roman is licensed from Monotype, hence the original name. Times New Roman_sentence_118

For compatibility, Monotype had to subtly redraw their design to match the widths from the Adobe/Linotype version. Times New Roman_sentence_119

Versions of Times New Roman from Monotype (discussed below) exist which vary from the PostScript metrics. Times New Roman_sentence_120

Linotype applied for registration of the trademark name Times Roman and received registration status in 1945. Times New Roman_sentence_121

Modern releases Times New Roman_section_12

As Times New Roman Times New Roman_section_13

Monotype sells a wider range of styles and optical sizes for Times New Roman than are offered with Windows, in order to meet the needs of newspapers and books which print at a range of text sizes. Times New Roman_sentence_122

Its current release includes Regular, Medium, Semi Bold and Bold weights with matching italics, Extra Bold, Condensed (in regular, italic and bold), Seven (for smaller text, in regular, italic, bold and bold italic) and Small Text (for very small text, in regular, italic and bold). Times New Roman_sentence_123

The four-weight version included with Windows was also distributed as part of Microsoft's Core Fonts for the Web package. Times New Roman_sentence_124

As of 2017, the version of Times New Roman included with Windows 10, version 6.96, includes small capitals, text figures, and italic swash capitals. Times New Roman_sentence_125

The Microsoft/Monotype digitisation of Times New Roman omits automatic ligature insertion which can result in unsightly character collisions if the characters 'fi' are needed; it is included in the version of Times installed with macOS. Times New Roman_sentence_126

Times New Roman World Times New Roman_section_14

This is a version based on fonts released with Windows Vista. Times New Roman_sentence_127

It includes fonts in WGL character sets, Hebrew and Arabic characters. Times New Roman_sentence_128

Similar to Helvetica World, Arabic in italic fonts are in roman positions. Times New Roman_sentence_129

Linotype variants Times New Roman_section_15

Like Monotype, Linotype released additional versions of Times for different text sizes. Times New Roman_sentence_130

These include: Times New Roman_sentence_131

Times New Roman_unordered_list_0

  • Times Ten is a version specially designed for smaller text (12-point and below). It features wider characters and stronger hairlines. In 2004 prominent typeface designer Erik Spiekermann said that he believed that it was the best Times New Roman digitisation then available.Times New Roman_item_0_0
  • Times Eighteen, a headline version for point sizes of 18 and larger. The characters are subtly condensed and the hairlines are finer. The current version has no italics, but does have a lower case (whereas some Times titling fonts were capitals only).Times New Roman_item_0_1
  • Times Europa Office, a 2006 adaptation of The Times's 1972 design Times Europa (see below). This is a complete family of designs intended for use on poor-quality paper. The updating, created by Akira Kobayashi, contains tabular numbers, mathematical signs, and currency symbols. Each character has the same advance width in all the fonts in the family so that changing from regular to bold or italic does not affect word wrap.Times New Roman_item_0_2

Later typefaces used by The Times Times New Roman_section_16

The Times newspaper has commissioned various successors to Times New Roman: Times New Roman_sentence_132

Times New Roman_unordered_list_1

  • Times Europa was designed by Walter Tracy in 1972 for The Times, as a sturdier alternative to the Times font family, designed for the demands of faster printing presses and cheaper paper. It has been released commercially by Adobe, among others, recently in an updating by Linotype as Times Europa Office (discussed above).Times New Roman_item_1_3
  • Times Roman replaced Times Europa on 30 August 1982.Times New Roman_item_1_4
  • Times Millennium was made in 1991, drawn by Gunnlaugur Briem on the instructions of Aurobind Patel, composing manager of News International.Times New Roman_item_1_5
  • Times Classic first appeared in 2001. Designed as an economical face by Dave Farey and Richard Dawson, it took advantage of the new PC-based publishing system at the newspaper; the new typeface included 120 letters per font.Times New Roman_item_1_6
  • Times Modern was unveiled on 20 November 2006, as the successor of Times Classic. Designed for improving legibility in smaller font sizes, it uses 45-degree angled bracket serifs. It was designed by Research Studios, led by designer Neville Brody with input from Ben Preston, deputy editor of The Times. (Other designs have been released called Times Modern; see below.) During the Times New Roman period The Times also sometimes used Perpetua Titling.Times New Roman_item_1_7

William Starling Burgess Times New Roman_section_17

In 1994 the printing historian Mike Parker published claims that the design of Times New Roman's roman or regular style was based on a 1904 design of William Starling Burgess. Times New Roman_sentence_133

This theory remains controversial. Times New Roman_sentence_134

Parker and his friend Gerald Giampa, a Canadian printer who had bought up the defunct American branch of Lanston Monotype, claimed that, in 1904, Burgess created a type design for company documents at his shipyard in Marblehead, Massachusetts, and hired Lanston Monotype to issue it. Times New Roman_sentence_135

However, Burgess abandoned the idea and Monotype shelved the sketches, ultimately reusing them as a basis for Times New Roman. Times New Roman_sentence_136

Giampa claimed that he stumbled upon original material in 1987, after he had purchased Lanston Monotype, and that some of the papers that had been his evidence had been lost in a flood at his house, while Parker claimed that an additional source was material in a section of the Smithsonian now closed due to asbestos contamination. Times New Roman_sentence_137

Giampa asked Parker to complete the type from the limited number of surviving letters, which was issued in June 2009 by Font Bureau under the name of 'Starling'. Times New Roman_sentence_138

Reception to the claims was sceptical, with dismissal from Morison's biographer Nicolas Barker and Luc Devroye among others; Barker suggested that the material had been fabricated in order to aid Giampa in embarrassing Monotype's British branch, while Devroye and Thomas Phinney of FontLab suggested that the claim had begun as a prank. Times New Roman_sentence_139

In 2010, writer Mark Owens described Parker's article in retrospect as "the scantest of evidence" and a "fog of irrelevant details". Times New Roman_sentence_140

Monotype executive Dan Rhatigan described the theory as implausible in 2011: "I'll admit that I tend to side with the more fully documented (both in general, and in agreement with what little I can find within Monotype to support it) notion that Times New Roman was based on Plantin...I won't rule out the possibility that Starling Burgess drew up the concept first, but Occam's razor makes me doubt it." Times New Roman_sentence_141

The Times Online web site credits the design to "Stanley Morrison, Victor Lardent and perhaps Starling Burgess". Times New Roman_sentence_142

Designs inspired by Times New Roman Times New Roman_section_18

In the phototypesetting and digital typesetting periods many font designs have been published inspired by Times New Roman. Times New Roman_sentence_143

Although the digital data of Monotype and Linotype releases of Times New Roman are copyrighted, and the name Times is trademarked, the design is in many countries not copyrightable, notably in the United States, allowing alternative interpretations if they do not reuse digital data. Times New Roman_sentence_144

Times New Roman_unordered_list_2

  • Times Modern was a condensed and bold display variant published by, among others, Elsner+Flake. It was withdrawn from sale due to trademark disputes with the Times newspaper, which owns its own unrelated design named 'Times Modern' (see above).Times New Roman_item_2_8
  • CG Times is a variant of Times family made by Compugraphic.Times New Roman_item_2_9
  • Pelham is a version of Times Roman by DTP Types of Britain, which also designed an infant version with single-storey 'a' and 'g'.Times New Roman_item_2_10

Times New Roman_unordered_list_3

  • In the mid-1960s, a derivative of Times New Roman known as 'Press Roman' was used as a font for the IBM Composer. This was an ultra-premium electric 'golfball' typewriter system, intended to be used for producing high-quality office documents or copy to be photographically enlarged for small-scale printing projects. Unlike most typewriters, the Composer produced proportional type, rather than monospaced letters. Ultimately the system proved a niche product, as it competed with increasingly cheap phototypesetting, and then in the 1980s was largely displaced by word processors and general-purpose computers.Times New Roman_item_3_11
  • Among many digital-period designs loosely inspired by Times, Kris Sowersby's popular Tiempos family is a loose Times New Roman revival; it was created for a Spanish newspaper ('tiempo' is Spanish for 'time').Times New Roman_item_3_12

Free alternatives Times New Roman_section_19

There are some free software fonts used as alternatives, including metric-compatible designs used for font substitution. Times New Roman_sentence_145

Times New Roman_unordered_list_4

  • URW++ produced a version of Times New Roman called Nimbus Roman in 1982. Nimbus Roman No9 L, URW's PostScript variant, was released under the GNU General Public License in 1996, and is included with some free and open source software. Various adapted versions exist including FreeSerif, TeX Gyre Termes and TeX Gyre Termes Math. Like Times New Roman, many additional styles of Nimbus Roman exist that are only sold commercially, including condensed and extra-bold styles. URW also developed Nimbus Roman No. 4, which is metrically compatible with the slightly different CG Times.Times New Roman_item_4_13
  • Linux Libertine developed in 2003 released under the GNU General Public License and the SIL Open Font License. Adopted for the redesign of the Wikipedia logo in 2010.Times New Roman_item_4_14

Times New Roman_unordered_list_5

  • The STIX Fonts project is a four-style set of open-source fonts. They were created for scientific publishing by the Scientific and Technical Information Exchange consortium of publishers, but are also very suitable for general use, including Greek and Cyrillic support. The original version is installed by default on Mac OS X, and adapted as XITS. In 2016, a completely redesigned version was released by Ross Mills and John Hudson of Tiro Typeworks. Unlike the previous version, it is an original design loosely inspired by a smaller 10-point size of Times New Roman, with a higher x-height than Monotype's Times digitisation.Times New Roman_item_5_15
  • Liberation Serif by Steve Matteson is metrically equivalent to Times New Roman. It was developed by Ascender Corp. and published by Red Hat in 2007 under the GPL with the font exception. Widths aside, it does not particularly resemble Times New Roman, being much squarer in shape with less fine detail and blunt ends rather than ball terminals. Google's Tinos in the Croscore fonts package is a derivative of Liberation Serif.Times New Roman_item_5_16
  • Bitstream Cyberbit is a roman-only font released by Bitstream with an expanded character range intended to cover a large proportion of Unicode for scholarly use, with European alphabets based on Times New Roman. Bitstream no longer offers the font, but it remains downloadable from the University of Frankfurt.Times New Roman_item_5_17

Credits to the contents of this page go to the authors of the corresponding Wikipedia page: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Times New Roman.