The term is derived from the Greek χρῆσις chresis meaning "a use" and refers to published usage of a name.
The technical meaning of the related term synonym is for different names that refer to the same object or concept.
As noted by Hobart and Rozella B. Smith, zoological systematists had been using "the term (synonymy) in another sense as well, namely in reference to all occurrences of any name or set of names (usually synonyms) in the literature."
Such a "synonymy" could include multiple listings, one for each place the author found a name used, rather than a summarized list of different synonyms.
The term "chresonym" was created to distinguish this second sense of the term "synonym."
The concept of synonymy is furthermore different in the zoological and botanical codes of nomenclature.
A name that correctly refers to a taxon is further termed an orthochresonym while one that is applied incorrectly for a given taxon may be termed a heterochresonym.
Species names often also include a reference to the original publication of the name by including the author and sometimes the year of publication of the name.
Thus, the name may also be referenced as Physeter catodon Linnaeus 1758.
That name was also used by Harmer in 1928 to refer to the species in the Proceedings of the Linnaean Society of London and of course, it has appeared in numerous other publications since then.
Taxonomic catalogues, such as Catalog of Living Whales by Philip Hershkovitz, may reference this usage with a Genus+species+authorship convention that may appear to indicate a new species (a homonym) when in fact it is referencing a particular usage of a species name (a chresonym).
Hershkovitz, for example refers to Physeter catodon Harmer 1928, which can cause confusion as this name+author combination really refers to the same name that Linnaeus first published in 1758.
The name Nepenthes rafflesiana as used by Hugh Low in 1848 is a heterochresonym.
Cheek and Jebb (2001) explain the situation thus:
The description that Maxwell Tylden Masters provided in 1881 for the taxon that had previously been known to gardeners as Nepenthes hookeriana (an interchangeable form of the name for the hybrid Nepenthes × hookeriana) differs from Low's description.
The International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants does not require that descriptions from so long ago include specification of a type specimen, and types can be chosen later to fit these old names.
Since the descriptions differ, Low's and Masters' name have different types.
Masters therefore created a later homonym, which, according to the rules of the code is illegitimate.
Credits to the contents of this page go to the authors of the corresponding Wikipedia page: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chresonym.